I gave a test a couple of weeks ago in my Calculus I class. The syllabus covered limits and derivatives. Among other problems, I always ask students to write down the derivative formulas and then give an assortment of derivative problems. Here is the relevant segment of the test:

I noticed a correlation (0.72) between knowing the derivative formulas and finding the derivatives of more complicated functions correctly. Not that correlation implies causation or anything, just that there is one.

Without the outlier on the left, the correlation is 0.56, which is less, but still notable.

Would you say knowing formulas is predictive of solving derivative problems correctly on a test? Most calculus instructors would agree. It makes sense to commit to memory some of the routine formulas and rules, at least for the duration of the course, even if they are forgotten later. It becomes easier to participate in classroom discussions and speeds up doing the homework.

However, to answer the question more accurately I would have to give another class a test and allow them to have a formula sheet. Then I could compare the test scores of the two classes to see if one class did significantly better than the other. And what if one class just happens to have stronger students than the other? Then I would have to repeat the experiment several times to draw a meaningful conclusion. Still, there may be completely unexpected lurking variables.

Nonetheless, here is a correlation and scatter plot for what it is worth. I like to see that group of points on the right end of the graph. It means there are a good number of students learning what I am expecting them to learn.

ne class did significantly better than the other. And what if one class just happens to have stronger students than the other? Then I would have to

ne class did significantly better than the other. And what if one class just happens to have stronger students than the other? Then I would have to

this with this light before. This article truly did switch topic goes http://bandarxl.xyz/

nice post.. i will learn latter..

poker trosss

please come here and visit http://w88messi.biz/

great post you have guys and i really like it.. please visit us at http://jampoker.co

good post and lovely

I like it and i will share it to others. Join us at http://bolanet88.biz

thanks

please join with us soon

http://ratugol.com

Thanks for sharing this nice post. just follow http://lagapoker.net

you have a great post and i like it.. please join us at http://goopoker.com

good post

One of the great and useful post, i really like it. Thanks for sharing this nice post. Great efforts made here keep the efforts up and thanks for the efforts. visit http://pokernet88.co

thank you your article very help me, your article highly recommended once

While this subject can be very touchy for most people, my opinion is that there has to be a middle or common ground that we all can find. I do appreciate that you’ve added relevant and intelligent commentary here though. Thanks!

Pingback: Analysis of a Calculus Test – Part 2 | CUNYMath Blog

Thanks for reading. That is a great observation. In fact, a student wrote on her test that she had difficulty figuring out when to use product rule versus chain rule. I will add a segment to my homeworks and tests to address this explicitly.

In my experience what is most critical in students being able to be successful in doing problems like those in 5. is that they are comfortable with the pattern recognition skills (parsing the question if you like) so they can tell if they will need the product rule, the quotient rule, the chain rule in its “full glory,” just the power rule version of the chain rule (as is the case for 5b), or a mixture of these rules.